Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 132
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dis ; 229(1): 83-94, 2024 Jan 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37440459

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) epidemiology, clinical characteristics and risk factors for poor outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remain a poorly investigated area. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study examined the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and risk factors for poor outcomes associated with human metapneumovirus (hMPV) infections in recipients of allo-HCT. RESULTS: We included 428 allo-HCT recipients who developed 438 hMPV infection episodes between January 2012 and January 2019. Most recipients were adults (93%). hMPV infections were diagnosed at a median of 373 days after allo-HCT. The infections were categorized as upper respiratory tract disease (URTD) or lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD), with 60% and 40% of cases, respectively. Patients with hMPV LRTD experienced the infection earlier in the transplant course and had higher rates of lymphopenia, neutropenia, corticosteroid use, and ribavirin therapy. Multivariate analysis identified lymphopenia and corticosteroid use (>30 mg/d) as independent risk factors for LRTD occurrence. The overall mortality at day 30 after hMPV detection was 2% for URTD, 12% for possible LRTD, and 21% for proven LRTD. Lymphopenia was the only independent risk factor associated with day 30 mortality in LRTD cases. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the significance of lymphopenia and corticosteroid use in the development and severity of hMPV infections after allo-HCT, with lymphopenia being a predictor of higher mortality in LRTD cases.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfopenia , Metapneumovirus , Infecções por Paramyxoviridae , Infecções Respiratórias , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/etiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Paramyxoviridae/epidemiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico
2.
Viruses ; 15(10)2023 10 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37896843

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Scarce data exist that analyze the outcomes of hematological patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron variant period who received treatment with remdesivir or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. METHODS: This study aims to address this issue by using a retrospective observational registry, created by the Spanish Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy Group, spanning from 27 December 2021 to 30 April 2023. RESULTS: This study included 466 patients, 243 (52%) who were treated with remdesivir and 223 (48%) with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was primarily used for mild cases, resulting in a lower COVID-19-related mortality rate (1.3%), while remdesivir was preferred for moderate to severe cases (40%), exhibiting a higher mortality rate (9%). A multivariate analysis in the remdesivir cohort showed that male gender (odds ratio (OR) 0.35, p = 0.042) correlated with a lower mortality risk, while corticosteroid use (OR 9.4, p < 0.001) and co-infection (OR 2.8, p = 0.047) were linked to a higher mortality risk. Prolonged virus shedding was common, with 52% of patients shedding the virus for more than 25 days. In patients treated with remdesivir, factors associated with prolonged shedding included B-cell malignancy as well as underlying disease, severe disease, a later onset of and shorter duration of remdesivir treatment and a higher baseline viral load. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir demonstrated a comparable safety profile to remdesivir, despite a higher risk of drug interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir proved to be a safe and effective option for treating mild cases in the outpatient setting, while remdesivir was preferred for severe cases, where corticosteroids and co-infection significantly predicted worse outcomes. Despite antiviral therapy, prolonged shedding remains a matter of concern.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antivirais/uso terapêutico
3.
Am J Hematol ; 98(12): 1909-1922, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37792579

RESUMO

Low-count monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBLlo ) has been associated with an underlying immunodeficiency and has recently emerged as a new risk factor for severe COVID-19. Here, we investigated the kinetics of immune cell and antibody responses in blood during COVID-19 of MBLlo versus non-MBL patients. For this study, we analyzed the kinetics of immune cells in blood of 336 COVID-19 patients (74 MBLlo and 262 non-MBL), who had not been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, over a period of 43 weeks since the onset of infection, using high-sensitivity flow cytometry. Plasma levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured in parallel by ELISA. Overall, early after the onset of symptoms, MBLlo COVID-19 patients showed increased neutrophil, monocyte, and particularly, plasma cell (PC) counts, whereas eosinophil, dendritic cell, basophil, and lymphocyte counts were markedly decreased in blood of a variable percentage of samples, and with a tendency toward normal levels from week +5 of infection onward. Compared with non-MBL patients, MBLlo COVID-19 patients presented higher neutrophil counts, together with decreased pre-GC B-cell, dendritic cell, and innate-like T-cell counts. Higher PC levels, together with a delayed PC peak and greater plasma levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (at week +2 to week +4) were also observed in MBLlo patients. In summary, MBLlo COVID-19 patients share immune profiles previously described for patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, associated with a delayed but more pronounced PC and antibody humoral response once compared with non-MBL patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B , Linfocitose , Neoplasias de Plasmócitos , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas , Humanos , Linfócitos B , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/diagnóstico , Formação de Anticorpos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Antivirais
4.
Microbiol Spectr ; 11(4): e0067423, 2023 08 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37367629

RESUMO

Optimal coverage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is challenging in febrile neutropenic patients due to a progressive increase in antibiotic resistance worldwide. We aimed to detail current rates of resistance to antibiotics recommended by international guidelines for P. aeruginosa isolated from bloodstream infections (BSI) in patients with hematologic malignancies. Secondarily, we aimed to describe how many patients received inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) and its impact on mortality. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of the last 20 BSI episodes caused by P. aeruginosa in patients with hematologic malignancies from across 14 university hospitals in Spain. Of the 280 patients with hematologic malignancies and BSI caused by P. aeruginosa, 101 (36%) had strains resistant to at least one of the ß-lactam antibiotics recommended in international guidelines, namely, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem. Additionally, 21.1% and 11.4% of the strains met criteria for MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa, respectively. Even if international guidelines were followed in most cases, 47 (16.8%) patients received IEAT and 66 (23.6%) received inappropriate ß-lactam empirical antibiotic treatment. Thirty-day mortality was 27.1%. In the multivariate analysis, pulmonary source (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.34) and IEAT (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.23) were factors independently associated with increased mortality. We concluded that P. aeruginosa-causing BSI in patients with hematologic malignancies is commonly resistant to antibiotics recommended in international guidelines, which is associated with frequent IEAT and higher mortality. New therapeutic strategies are needed. IMPORTANCE Bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by P. aeruginosa is related with an elevated morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients. For this reason, optimal antipseudomonal coverage has been the basis of all historical recommendations in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. However, in recent years the emergence of multiple types of antibiotic resistances has posed a challenge in treating infections caused by this microorganism. In our study we postulated that P. aeruginosa-causing BSI in patients with hematologic malignancies is commonly resistant to antibiotics recommended in international guidelines. This observation is associated with frequent IEAT and increased mortality. Consequently, there is a need for a new therapeutic strategy.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Sepse , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Meropeném , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico
5.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 36(3): 236-258, jun. 2023. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-220755

RESUMO

The administration of antifungals for therapeutic and, especially, prophylactic purposes is virtually a constant in patients requiring hematology-oncology treatment. Any attempt to prevent or treat Aspergillus or Mucor infections requires the administration of some drugs in the azole group, which include voriconazole, posaconazole and isavuconazole, noted for their activity against these pathogens. One very relevant aspect is the potential risk of interaction when associated with one of the antineoplastic drugs used to treat hematologic tumors, with serious complications. In this regard, acalabrutinib, bortezomib, bosutinib, carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, dasatinib, duvelisib, gilteritinib, glasdegib, ibrutinib, imatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, prednisone, ruxolitinib, tacrolimus, all-transretinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, venetoclax, or any of the vinca alkaloids, are very clear examples of risk, in some cases because their clearance is reduced and in others because of increased risk of QTc prolongation, which is particularly evident when the drug of choice is voriconazole or posaconazole. (AU)


La administración de antifúngicos con fines terapéuticos y especialmente, profilácticos es casi un constante en el paciente que precisa tratamiento oncohematológico. El intento de evitar o de tratar infecciones por Aspergillus o por Mucor exige la administración de algunos fármacos pertenecientes al grupo de los azoles, entre los que destacan por su actividad frente a estos patógenos, voriconazol, posaconazol e isavuconazol. Un aspecto de gran importancia es el riesgo potencial de interacciones cuando se asocian a alguno de los fármacos antineoplásico utilizados en el tratamiento de los tumores hematológicos, dando lugar a graves complicaciones. En este sentido, acalabrutinib, bortezomid, bosutinib, carfizolid, ciclofosfamida, ciscloporina A, dasatinib, duvelisib, gilteritinib, glasdegib, ibrutinib, imatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, prednisona, ruxolitinib, tacrolimus, transretinoico, trióxido de Arsenio, venetoclax, o cualquiera de los alcaloides de la vinca, representan ejemplos muy evidentes de riesgos en unos casos porque su aclaramiento resulta reducido, en otros porque que se potencia el riesgo de prolongación del QTc, especialmente evidentes cuando el fármaco elegido es voriconazol o posaconazol. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Azóis , Antifúngicos , Interações Medicamentosas , Voriconazol
6.
J Infect ; 87(1): 46-53, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37201859

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We describe the current epidemiology, causes, and outcomes of breakthrough invasive fungal infections (BtIFI) in patients with haematologic malignancies. METHODS: BtIFI in patients with ≥ 7 days of prior antifungals were prospectively diagnosed (36 months across 13 Spanish hospitals) according to revised EORTC/MSG definitions. RESULTS: 121 episodes of BtIFI were documented, of which 41 (33.9%) were proven; 53 (43.8%), probable; and 27 (22.3%), possible. The most frequent prior antifungals included posaconazole (32.2%), echinocandins (28.9%) and fluconazole (24.8%)-mainly for primary prophylaxis (81%). The most common haematologic malignancy was acute leukaemia (64.5%), and 59 (48.8%) patients had undergone a hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Invasive aspergillosis, principally caused by non-fumigatus Aspergillus, was the most frequent BtIFI with 55 (45.5%) episodes recorded, followed by candidemia (23, 19%), mucormycosis (7, 5.8%), other moulds (6, 5%) and other yeasts (5, 4.1%). Azole resistance/non-susceptibility was commonly found. Prior antifungal therapy widely determined BtIFI epidemiology. The most common cause of BtIFI in proven and probable cases was the lack of activity of the prior antifungal (63, 67.0%). At diagnosis, antifungal therapy was mostly changed (90.9%), mainly to liposomal amphotericin-B (48.8%). Overall, 100-day mortality was 47.1%; BtIFI was either the cause or an essential contributing factor to death in 61.4% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: BtIFI are mainly caused by non-fumigatus Aspergillus, non-albicans Candida, Mucorales and other rare species of mould and yeast. Prior antifungals determine the epidemiology of BtIFI. The exceedingly high mortality due to BtIFI warrants an aggressive diagnostic approach and early initiation of broad-spectrum antifungals different than those previously used.


Assuntos
Candidemia , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas , Humanos , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/epidemiologia , Fungos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Aspergillus
7.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 25(3): e14065, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37120821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether donor-recipient mismatch involving one or more cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunodominant (ID) human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-I alleles may impact on the degree of CMV pp65/immediate-early 1 (IE-1) T-cell reconstitution and the incidence of CMV DNAemia in patients undergoing unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with high-dose posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT/Cy-haplo). METHODS: Multicenter observational study including 106 consecutive adult PT/Cy-haplo patients (34 CMV ID HLA-I matched and 72 mismatched). A real-time PCR was used for plasma CMV DNA load monitoring. Enumeration of CMV-specific (pp65/IE-1) interferon (IFN)-γ-producing T cells from several patients was performed by flow cytometry by days +30, +60, +90 and +180 after transplantation. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia, clinically significant CMV DNAemia episodes (cs-CMVi), and recurrent CMV DNAemia was comparable across CMV ID HLA-I matched and mismatched patients (71.8% vs. 80.9%, p = .95; 40.7% vs. 44.2%, p = .85; 16.4% vs. 28.1%; p = .43, respectively). The percentage of patients exhibiting detectable CMV-specific IFN-γ-producing T-cell responses (either CD8+ or CD4+ ) was similar across groups; nevertheless, significantly higher CMV-specific CD8+ T-cell counts were enumerated in the CMV ID HLA-I matched compared to mismatched patients by day +60 (p = .04) and +180 (p = .016) after transplantation. CONCLUSION: CMV ID HLA-I matching may impact on the magnitude of CMV-pp65/IE-1-specific CD8+ T-cell reconstitution; yet, this effect seemed not to have an impact on the incidence of initial, recurrent CMV DNAemia, or cs-CMVi.


Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Reconstituição Imune , Adulto , Humanos , Citomegalovirus , Incidência , Transplante Homólogo , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos
8.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 58(5): 567-580, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36854892

RESUMO

The kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 reactive IgG antibodies after full vaccination and booster in allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT, ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) are of utmost importance for estimating risk of infection. A prospective multicenter registry-based cohort study, conducted from December 2020 to July 2022 was used to analyze antibody waning over time, booster effect and the relationship of antibody response and breakthrough infection in 572 recipients (429 allo-HSCT, 121 ASCT and 22 CAR-T cell therapy). A significant decline in antibody titers was observed at 3 and 6 months after full vaccination in recipients without pre-vaccine SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas recipients infected prior to vaccination showed higher and stable antibody titers over time. In poor responders, a booster dose was able to increase antibody titers in 83% of allo-HSCT and 58% of ASCT recipients but not in CART-T cell recipients [0%] (p < 0.01). One-year cumulative incidence of breakthrough infection was 15%, similar among cell therapy procedures. Immunosuppressive drugs at the time of vaccination [hazard ratio (HR) 1.81, p = 0.0028] and reduced intensity conditioning (HR 0.49, p = 0.011) were identified as the only conditions associated with different risk of breakthrough infection in allo-HSCT recipients. Antibody titers were associated with breakthrough infection and disease severity. No death was observed among the 72 breakthrough infections. Antibody level decay after the first two vaccine doses was common except in recipients with pre-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection. Poorly responding allo-HSCT recipients showed a response advantage with the booster as compared to ASCT and, especially, the null response found in CAR-T cell recipients. Antibody titers were positively correlated with the risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection which was mainly driven by the immunosuppression status.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinação , Infecções Irruptivas , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos , Transplantados
9.
Blood Cancer J ; 13(1): 8, 2023 01 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36599843

RESUMO

The long-term clinical efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to antibody response in immunosuppressed patients such as hematological patients has been little explored. A prospective multicenter registry-based cohort study conducted from December 2020 to July 2022 by the Spanish Transplant and Cell Therapy group, was used to analyze the relationship of antibody response over time after full vaccination (at 3-6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months) (2 doses) and of booster doses with breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in 1551 patients with hematological disorders. At a median follow-up of 388 days after complete immunization, 266 out of 1551 (17%) developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection at median of 86 days (range 7-391) after full vaccination. The cumulative incidence was 18% [95% confidence interval (C.I.), 16-20%]. Multivariate analysis identified higher incidence in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients (29%) and with the use of corticosteroids (24.5%), whereas female sex (15.5%) and more than 1 year after last therapy (14%) were associated with a lower incidence (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Median antibody titers at different time points were significantly lower in breakthrough cases than in non-cases. A serological titer cut-off of 250 BAU/mL was predictive of breakthrough infection and its severity. SARS-CoV-2 infection-related mortality was encouragingly low (1.9%) in our series. Our study describes the incidence of and risk factors for COVID-19 breakthrough infections during the initial vaccination and booster doses in the 2021 to mid-2022 period. The level of antibody titers at any time after 2-dose vaccination is strongly linked with protection against both breakthrough infection and severe disease, even with the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos
12.
Ann Hematol ; 101(9): 2053-2067, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35780254

RESUMO

Prior studies of antibody response after full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hematological patients have confirmed lower antibody levels compared to the general population. Serological response in hematological patients varies widely according to the disease type and its status, and the treatment given and its timing with respect to vaccination. Through probabilistic machine learning graphical models, we estimated the conditional probabilities of having detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at 3-6 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a large cohort of patients with several hematological diseases (n= 1166). Most patients received mRNA-based vaccines (97%), mainly Moderna® mRNA-1273 (74%) followed by Pfizer-BioNTech® BNT162b2 (23%). The overall antibody detection rate at 3 to 6 weeks after full vaccination for the entire cohort was 79%. Variables such as type of disease, timing of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy, age, corticosteroids therapy, vaccine type, disease status, or prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 are among the most relevant conditions influencing SARS-CoV-2-IgG-reactive antibody detection. A lower probability of having detectable antibodies was observed in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies within 6 months before vaccination (29.32%), whereas the highest probability was observed in younger patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (99.53%). The Moderna® mRNA-1273 compound provided higher probabilities of antibody detection in all scenarios. This study depicts conditional probabilities of having detectable antibodies in the whole cohort and in specific scenarios such as B cell NHL, CLL, MM, and cMPN that may impact humoral responses. These results could be useful to focus on additional preventive and/or monitoring interventions in these highly immunosuppressed hematological patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , COVID-19 , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
13.
J Hematol Oncol ; 15(1): 54, 2022 05 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35526045

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines according to antibody response in immunosuppressed patients such as hematological patients has not yet been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter registry-based cohort study conducted from December 2020 to December 2021 by the Spanish transplant and cell therapy group was used to analyze the relationship of antibody response at 3-6 weeks after full vaccination (2 doses) with breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in 1394 patients with hematological disorders. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 165 days after complete immunization, 37 out of 1394 (2.6%) developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection at median of 77 days (range 7-195) after full vaccination. The incidence rate was 6.39 per 100 persons-year. Most patients were asymptomatic (19/37, 51.4%), whereas only 19% developed pneumonia. The mortality rate was 8%. Lack of detectable antibodies at 3-6 weeks after full vaccination was the only variable associated with breakthrough infection in multivariate logistic regression analysis (Odds Ratio 2.35, 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.6, p = 0.012). Median antibody titers were lower in cases than in non-cases [1.83 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL (range 0-4854.93) vs 730.81 BAU/mL (range 0-56,800), respectively (p = 0.007)]. We identified 250 BAU/mL as a cutoff above which incidence and severity of the infection were significantly lower. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the benefit of developing an antibody response in these highly immunosuppressed patients. Level of antibody titers at 3 to 6 weeks after 2-dose vaccination links with protection against both breakthrough infection and severe disease for non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Hematológicas , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Doenças Hematológicas/complicações , Doenças Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
14.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 77(7): 2017-2023, 2022 06 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35466357

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe current resistance to the ß-lactams empirically recommended in the guidelines in bloodstream infection (BSI) episodes caused by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre cohort study of the last 50 BSI episodes in haematological patients across 14 university hospitals in Spain. Rates of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT) and impact on mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 700 BSI episodes, 308 (44%) were caused by GNB, mainly Escherichia coli (141; 20.1%), Klebsiella spp. (56; 8%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (48; 6.9%). Among GNB BSI episodes, 80 (26%) were caused by MDR isolates. In those caused by Enterobacterales, 25.8% were ESBL producers and 3.5% were carbapenemase producers. Among P. aeruginosa BSI episodes, 18.8% were caused by MDR isolates. Overall, 34.7% of the isolated GNB were resistant to at least one of the three ß-lactams recommended in febrile neutropenia guidelines (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem). Despite extensive compliance with guideline recommendations (91.6%), 16.6% of BSI episodes caused by GNB received IEAT, which was more frequent among MDR GNB isolates (46.3% versus 6.1%; P < 0.001). Thirty day mortality was 14.6%, reaching 21.6% in patients receiving IEAT. CONCLUSIONS: Current resistance to empirical ß-lactams recommended in febrile neutropenia guidelines is exceedingly high and IEAT rates are greater than desired. There is an urgent need to adapt guidelines to current epidemiology and better identify patients with a high risk of developing MDR GNB infection.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Neutropenia Febril , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Sepse , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Espanha/epidemiologia , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico
15.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(3): e0229221, 2022 06 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35475683

RESUMO

We sought to assess the characteristics and outcomes of neutropenic hematologic patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bloodstream infection (BSI) treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). We conducted a multicenter, international, matched-cohort study of PA BSI episodes in neutropenic hematologic patients who received C/T. Controls were patients with PA BSI treated with other antibiotics. Risk factors for overall 7-day and 30-day case fatality rates were analyzed. We compared 44 cases with 88 controls. Overall, 91% of episodes were caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. An endogenous source was the most frequent BSI origin (35.6%), followed by pneumonia (25.8%). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between groups. C/T was given empirically in 11 patients and as definitive therapy in 41 patients. Treatment with C/T was associated with less need for mechanical ventilation (13.6% versus 33.3%; P = 0.021) and reduced 7-day (6.8% versus 34.1%; P = 0.001) and 30-day (22.7% versus 48.9%; P = 0.005) mortality. In the multivariate analysis, pneumonia, profound neutropenia, and persistent BSI were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality, whereas lower mortality was found among patients treated with C/T (adjusted OR [aOR] of 0.19; confidence interval [CI] 95% of 0.07 to 0.55; P = 0.002). Therapy with C/T was associated with less need for mechanical ventilation and reduced 7-day and 30-day case fatality rates compared to alternative agents in neutropenic hematologic patients with PA BSI. IMPORTANCE Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of difficult to treat infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) in the general nonimmunocompromised population. However, the experience of this agent in immunosuppressed neutropenic patients is very limited. Our study is unique because it is focused on extremely immunosuppressed hematological patients with neutropenia and bloodstream infection (BSI) due to PA (mainly multidrug resistant [MDR]), a scenario which is often associated with very high mortality rates. In our study, we found that the use of C/T for the treatment of MDR PA BSI in hematological neutropenic patients was significantly associated with improved outcomes, and, in addition, it was found to be an independent risk factor associated with increased survival. To date, this is the largest series involving neutropenic hematologic patients with PA BSI treated with C/T.


Assuntos
Neutropenia , Pneumonia , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Sepse , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Neutropenia/complicações , Neutropenia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Tazobactam/farmacologia , Tazobactam/uso terapêutico
16.
Am J Hematol ; 97(1): 30-42, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34695229

RESUMO

This is a multicenter prospective observational study that included a large cohort (n = 397) of allogeneic (allo-HSCT; (n = 311) and autologous (ASCT) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (n = 86) recipients who were monitored for antibody detection within 3-6 weeks after complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination from February 1, 2021, to July 20, 2021. Most patients (n = 387, 97.4%) received mRNA-based vaccines. Most of the recipients (93%) were vaccinated more than 1 year after transplant. Detectable SARS-CoV-2-reactive antibodies were observed in 242 (78%) of allo-HSCT and in 73 (85%) of ASCT recipients. Multivariate analysis in allo-HSCT recipients identified lymphopenia < 1 × 109 /ml (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.16-0.69, p = .003), active graft versus host disease (GvHD; OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.98, p = .04) and vaccination within the first year of transplant (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.15-0.9, p = .04) associated with lower antibody detection whereas. In ASCT, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL; OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.44, p = .003) and active corticosteroid therapy (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02-0.87, p = .03) were associated with lower detection rate. We report an encouraging rate of SARS-CoV-2-reactive antibodies detection in these severe immunocompromised patients. Lymphopenia, GvHD, the timing of vaccine, and NHL and corticosteroids therapy should be considered in allo-HSCT and ASCT, respectively, to identify candidates for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies monitoring.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
17.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 63(3): 538-550, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34668835

RESUMO

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, different vaccines in front of SARS-CoV-2 have been approved and administered in different vulnerable populations. As patients with cancer were excluded from pivotal trials of vaccination, little is known on their immunogenic response to these vaccines, particularly in patients with severely impaired immune system. In response to that uncertainty, the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy launched an initiative aimed to provide recommendations for vaccination of the main hematological conditions. This document is based on the available information on COVID-19 outcomes, prior knowledge on vaccination in hematological patients, recent published data on serological response in oncohematological patients and expert opinions. New information about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination will be gathered in the near future, providing new scientific grounds to delineate the most adequate management of vaccination in patients with hematological diseases. The current limited data on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in hematological patients represents a major limitation of this expert consensus opinion. In fact, the speed in which this field evolves may reduce their validity in the near future.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hematologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Consenso , Prova Pericial , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
18.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0254135, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383780

RESUMO

The number of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations has risen in the past 20 years. The practice of outpatient Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation programs is increasing in an attempt to improve the quality of patient care and reduce the demand for hospital admission. A systematic review of 29 comparative studies between in-hospital and outpatient treatment of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, with no restriction by outpatient regime was conducted. This study aims to analyse the current evidence on the effects of the outpatient model on patient-centred outcomes, comparing both in-hospital and outpatient models for autologous and allogeneic HSCT using the Triple Aim framework: health outcomes, costs and experience of care. We found evidence on improved health outcomes and quality of life, on enhanced safety and effectiveness and on reduced overall costs and hospital stays, with similar results on overall survival rates comparing both models for autologous and allogeneic patients. We also found that the outpatient Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation is a safe practice as well as less costly, it requires fewer days of hospital stay both for autologous and allogeneic transplantations. Under a situation of an increasing number of transplants, rising healthcare costs and shortages of hospital capacity, incorporating outpatient models could improve the quality of care for people requiring Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation programs.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Qualidade de Vida , Custos e Análise de Custo , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/mortalidade , Humanos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Transplante Autólogo , Transplante Homólogo
19.
Rev Iberoam Micol ; 38(2): 61-67, 2021.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33994104

RESUMO

Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) has been a key cornerstone for the management of invasive fungal infections (IFI) caused by a wide array of molds and yeasts during the last three decades. Multiple studies performed over this period have generated a large body of evidence on its efficacy and safety, becoming the main antifungal agent in the management of IFI in patients with hematologic malignancies in several not mutually exclusive clinical settings. First, L-AmB is the most commonly used antifungal agent in patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy for acute leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, as well as in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Additionally, due to the administration of newer targeted therapies (such as monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors), opportunistic mold infections are increasingly being reported in patients with hematologic malignancies usually considered low-risk for IFI. These agents usually have a high drug-drug interaction potential, being triazoles, commonly used for antifungal prophylaxis, included. Finally, patients developing breakthrough IFI because of either subtherapeutic concentrations of antifungal prophylactic drugs in blood or selection of resistant strains, require broad spectrum antifungal therapy, usually with an antifungal of a different class. In both situations, L-AmB remains as the best option for early antifungal therapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas , Anfotericina B/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Humanos , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico
20.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 23(4): e13627, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33908148

RESUMO

The potential role of active CMV infection in promoting acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGvHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a matter of debate. We further addressed this issue conducting a retrospective, observational, multicenter study of 632 patients subjected to allogeneic peripheral blood HSCT at 20 Spanish centers. Monitoring of CMV DNA load in plasma or whole blood was performed by real-time PCR assays. Cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia was 48.9% (95% CI, 45%-52.9%), of any grade aGvHD, 45.6; 95% (CI, 41.3%-50.1%), and of grade II-IV aGvHD, 30.7 (95% CI, 24.9%-36.4%). Overall, development of CMV DNAemia at any level resulted in an increased risk of subsequent all grade (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.08 - 1.76; P = .009) or grade II-IV (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.22 - 2.06; P = .001) aGvHD. The increased risk of aGvHD linked to prior occurrence of CMV DNAemia was similar to the above when only clinically significant episodes were considered for the analyses (HR for all grade aGvHD, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.13 - 1.91; P = .041, and HR for grade II-IV aGvHD, 1.53; 95% CI. 1.13-1.81; P = .04). The CMV DNA doubling time in blood was comparable overall in episodes of CMV DNAemia whether followed by aGvHD or not. Whether CMV replication is a surrogate risk marker of aGvHD or it is causally involved is an important question to be addressed in future experimental research.


Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Citomegalovirus/genética , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...